Resource-Zone: DMOZ is Dead...Long Live the Open Directory Movement! - Resource-Zone

Jump to content

  • (14 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

DMOZ is Dead...Long Live the Open Directory Movement! Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   June Bugeye 

  • Member
  • Group: Inactive
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 27-October 06

Posted 27 October 2006 - 10:33 AM

Well, it seems that DMOZ has been experiencing unspecified hardware problems for more than a week. More than a week with editors unable to log in; more than a week with no updates whatsoever; more than a week without any ability to explain the problem or offer an estimated time for it to be remedied.

I think this will be remembered as the week that DMOZ died.

Even if the servers ever come back on line (which no one from DMOZ has been willing to predict), I think that what remaining credibility the directory had left is now gone.

The open directory model is, however, too valuable to the Internet community to be lost, or more specifically, to allow it to be discredited by the fall of DMOZ. I think the critical error with DMOZ was the exclusivity inherent in its editorial process. Anyone reading these threads has to be appalled by the colossal arrogance of the moderators and senior editors.

Have a problem? It must be, according to them, that the failing is yours, not theirs. Has DMOZ erred? Impossible, according to them, DMOZ policy is such and such, and it is inconceivable that the individuals who administer those policies are anything but infallible.

Perhaps the time has come to try to marry the wiki approach championed by Wikipedia, with the structure of an online directory. It would, I realise, have to be organised in a way that is more resistant to abuse (since a web directory would tempt more abuse than an enclopedia), but I do not believe that this is beyond the skills of dedicated people. At the very least, it would have to be an improvement over the tyranny of the DMOZ editor-priesthood.

I'm sad to see DMOZ go the way of its dinosaur-like mascot, but, like the dinosaur, it has had its day, and it has died because of its inherent inability to adapt.

I am going to write to the Wikipedia Foundation, and encourage them to create a new online directory to pick-up where DMOZ left off. I hope anyone reading this forum will join me in doing so.

#2 User is offline   pvgool 

  • World/Nederlands
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Catmod
  • Posts: 4,223
  • Joined: 08-October 02
  • Editor Namepvgool

Posted 27 October 2006 - 11:06 AM

June Bugeye said:

I am going to write to the Wikipedia Foundation, and encourage them to create a new online directory to pick-up where DMOZ left off.

Why ask someone else. You seem to know how everything should work. Act your self. Spilling words is easy. Live to what you say.
I will not answer PM or emails send to me. If you have anything to ask please use the forum.

#3 User is offline   Eric-the-Bun 

  • Moderator
  • Group: Meta
  • Posts: 528
  • Joined: 16-April 05
  • Editor Namejohndouglas

Posted 27 October 2006 - 11:12 AM

Quote

marry the wiki approach championed by Wikipedia, with the structure of an online directory
There is already one out there.:)

Quote

encourage them to create a new online directory
No, the idea of projects like these, is for you to get involved, not to expect somebody else to do the work for you. Other people are not there merely to fulfill your expectations.

Quote

I hope anyone reading this forum will join me in doing so.
I hope people do not spam another project with demands like this. A more reasonable approach would be to ask people to contact you so you can start organising it all.

regards
:) Though I am a volunteer editor, my opinions do not constitute an official ODP statement. :)
:o I reserve the right to be human and make mistakes. :o
:mad: Private messages asking for submission status or preferential treatment will be ignored. :mad:

#4 User is offline   hutcheson 

  • DMOZ Meta
  • Group: Meta
  • Posts: 9,532
  • Joined: 23-March 02

Posted 27 October 2006 - 11:16 AM

You don't need our permission to implement your scheme. There are certainly many SEO communities that will welcome your proposal -- should you begin to implement it, the announcement should be made there. (It may not be made here.)

#5 User is offline   donaldb 

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Inactive
  • Posts: 2,574
  • Joined: 25-March 02
  • Editor Namedonaldb

Posted 27 October 2006 - 11:22 AM

Run for cover! The sky is falling!

If the ODP actually died every time someone on a forum decided that it was dying, it would have been gone years ago.
ODP Editor: donaldb :moz:
Please do not contact me directly to ask me the status of your listing, because I will most likely ignore your message.
Read the "[thread=39116]Discontinuation of site status checks[/thread]" thread.

#6 User is offline   sounddude 

  • Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 27-October 06
  • Editor NameSounddude

Posted 27 October 2006 - 07:15 PM

And June, for your information, ODP has not died. It did experience a serious technical situation, but it is in the process of being restored. For a site it's size and to do it right, it takes time.

#7 User is offline   croatiankid 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Inactive
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 27-October 06

Posted 28 October 2006 - 03:04 AM

i just hope it's finished soon. i was worried when i'd go to submit url it said it couldn't find the cgi-bin directory, i thought maybe you weren't accepting new submissions because of the size of it.

#8 User is offline   emil2004 

  • Moderator
  • Group: Meta
  • Posts: 163
  • Joined: 18-February 04
  • Editor Nameemil2004

Posted 28 October 2006 - 03:34 AM

croatiankid said:

I was worried when i'd go to submit url it said it couldn't find the cgi-bin directory, i thought maybe you weren't accepting new submissions because of the size of it.


If you try doing the same again, you will see a message teeling you what is going on:cool:
ODP editor - emil2004

#9 User is offline   croatiankid 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Inactive
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 27-October 06

Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:34 AM

yeah i know, that's how i came to these forums in the first place

#10 User is offline   BIZ-GIANT 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Inactive
  • Posts: 25
  • Joined: 17-August 06

Posted 08 November 2006 - 01:40 PM

June Bugeye said:


I am going to write to the Wikipedia Foundation, and encourage them to create a new online directory to pick-up where DMOZ left off. I hope anyone reading this forum will join me in doing so.


Well their you have it another satisfied customer! :rolleyes:

thx
malcolm

#11 User is offline   hutcheson 

  • DMOZ Meta
  • Group: Meta
  • Posts: 9,532
  • Joined: 23-March 02

Posted 08 November 2006 - 01:44 PM

Make sure you give him his money back, and cancel his warranty registration.

#12 User is offline   R3D 

  • Member
  • Group: Inactive
  • Posts: 3
  • Joined: 26-October 06

Posted 08 November 2006 - 01:50 PM

that a search engine like google can still rely on this usless directory DMOZ

#13 User is offline   pvgool 

  • World/Nederlands
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Catmod
  • Posts: 4,223
  • Joined: 08-October 02
  • Editor Namepvgool

Posted 08 November 2006 - 01:54 PM

Maybe becuase it is not useless for them.
DMOZ is only "useless" for webmasters wanting to promote their site, and that is intentionaly.
I will not answer PM or emails send to me. If you have anything to ask please use the forum.

#14 User is offline   chaos127 

  • DMOZ Admin
  • Group: DMOZ Admin
  • Posts: 662
  • Joined: 13-November 03
  • Editor Namechaos127

Posted 08 November 2006 - 01:55 PM

I think "rely" is perhaps a bit strong. And if thy did use the ODP data in any way, that presumably would indicate something about what the world's best experts in search think about the quality of that data.

Yes, the editing side has been down for a bit, but the public facing view which provides the data to our users is still very much alive.

#15 User is offline   liszt 

  • DMOZ Meta
  • Group: Meta
  • Posts: 310
  • Joined: 19-May 05
  • Editor Nameliszt

Posted 08 November 2006 - 02:29 PM

@R3D
Don't agonize over google and ODP data... ;)
But if you believe that ODP data is useless why the hell do you try to suggest your own website to DMOZ?
:moz: ODP Meta Editor liszt


English : FAQ *** Editorial Guidelines

Deutsch: FAQ *** Editier-Richtlinien *** ODP Weblog

#16 User is offline   ishtar 

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Inactive
  • Posts: 344
  • Joined: 02-October 02

Posted 09 November 2006 - 11:40 AM

liszt said:

@R3D
Don't agonize over google and ODP data... ;)
But if you believe that ODP data is useless why the hell do you try to suggest your own website to DMOZ?
Can you at least try to be civil?

#17 User is offline   justbadco1 

  • Member
  • Group: Inactive
  • Posts: 4
  • Joined: 09-November 06

Posted 10 November 2006 - 09:23 AM

I've been thinking the same thing for awhile. You are 100% on point. I - for one - am with you. I finally got so frustrated that I basically posted the same ideas yesterday - but in a more, shall we say, "Direct" tone. DMOZ is dying.

#18 User is offline   crowbar 

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Inactive
  • Posts: 879
  • Joined: 07-November 06

Posted 10 November 2006 - 12:00 PM

Quote

Anyone reading these threads has to be appalled by the colossal arrogance of the moderators and senior editors.


Wow, are you metas really like that? I must have missed something over the last five years of editing, because you've always treated me fairly and respectfully as a fellow editor, :) .

And, you didn't become meta editors by sitting on your hands, but by being honest, trustworthy, and working ten times harder than anyone else.

Me thinks fair maiden knows not of what she speaks, ;) .

#19 User is offline   Janneke10 

  • Member
  • Group: Inactive
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 10-November 06

Posted 10 November 2006 - 04:08 PM

Does anyone know if and when DMOZ will be out of technical problems and be back on line?
It would be a shame if all this valuable information would get lost! Good luck in restoring it to whoever this will be.
Janneke Nijenhuis
The Netherlands

#20 User is offline   hutcheson 

  • DMOZ Meta
  • Group: Meta
  • Posts: 9,532
  • Joined: 23-March 02

Posted 10 November 2006 - 04:28 PM

No. But watch the Announcements forum for what we do know, when we know it.

Share this topic:


  • (14 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users


Copyright © 2002 - 2010 Contributing ODP editors - All Rights Reserved.
This site is in no way affiliated with Netscape Communications Corporation. This site is here as a service to directory users and is maintained by a group of editors.